WSGR logoWSGR logo
Matthew A. Argenti
Partner
Litigation
Palo Alto

D650-354-4154

Download vCard
Open PDF
  • PTAB Experience

    Matt represents petitioners and patent owners in contested, post-grant review proceedings before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB), and corresponding appeals to the Federal Circuit Court of Appeals.

  • A Recognized Practitioner

    Matt was recognized as among the Top 15 best performing PTAB attorneys overall (representing petitioners and patent owners) in Patexia’s 2024 PTAB Intelligence Report and was named the No. 1 best performing attorney on behalf of patent owners in Patexia’s 2021 IPR Intelligence Report.

  • Industry Recognition for Practice Accomplishments

    Routinely ranked as one of the most active PTAB practitioners by Docket Navigator, Patexia, and others.

Matthew (Matt) Argenti is a partner in the Palo Alto office of Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati, where he primarily focuses on patent litigation with an emphasis on post-grant review proceedings before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. He represents both petitioners and patent owners in contested proceedings under the America Invents Act, including inter partes reviews, covered business method reviews, and appeals to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit.

In addition, Matt has extensive experience litigating patent cases in federal courts and before the International Trade Commission. His work has involved a variety of technology areas, including computer networking, anti-virus software, telecommunications, consumer wiring devices, pharmaceuticals, medical devices, and semiconductors. Prior to attending law school, Matt worked in the memory products division of Cypress Semiconductor.

Experience

Matthew (Matt) Argenti is a partner in the Palo Alto office of Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati, where he primarily focuses on patent litigation with an emphasis on post-grant review proceedings before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. He represents both petitioners and patent owners in contested proceedings under the America Invents Act, including inter partes reviews, covered business method reviews, and appeals to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit.

In addition, Matt has extensive experience litigating patent cases in federal courts and before the International Trade Commission. His work has involved a variety of technology areas, including computer networking, anti-virus software, telecommunications, consumer wiring devices, pharmaceuticals, medical devices, and semiconductors. Prior to attending law school, Matt worked in the memory products division of Cypress Semiconductor.

Focus Areas
Recent Insights
Client Highlights
Wilson Sonsini Advises PayRange on Investment by Ridgeview Partners
On September 30, 2024, Ridgeview Partners, in partnership with The Baupost Group, announced it has agreed to make a significant strategic growth investment in PayRange, a leading provider of IOT software and payment solutions for unattended retail. Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati advised PayRange on the transaction.
Learn More
Alerts
U.S. Supreme Court Administrative Law Decisions Raise Questions for U.S. Patent and Trademark Office Proceedings
Last week, the U.S. Supreme Court decided two important administrative law cases that are expected to increase judicial authority over agency adjudications and rulemaking. In Securities & Exchange Commission v. Jarkesy (decided June 27), the Court held that when the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) seeks civil penalties for securities fraud, the defendant is entitled to a jury trial. In Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo (decided June 28), the Court held that courts should not defer to an agency statutory interpretation. While each ruling might have significant effects on some agencies, their effect on the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) should be much more limited because, generally, USPTO regulatory authorities are much more limited and because USPTO’s primary reviewing court, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, is a specialized court that does not defer to USPTO on legal questions.
Learn More
View All
WSGR logo
Copyright © 2024 Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati. All Rights Reserved.