On April 23, 2019, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) issued a proposed rule, which describes CMS' efforts to transform "the healthcare delivery system through competition and innovation to provide patients with better value and results," including updates to Medicare payment policies under the Inpatient Prospective Payment System (IPPS) and the Long-Term Care Hospital (LTCH) Prospective Payment System (PPS).1
According to CMS Administrator Seema Verma: "Transformative technologies are coming to the private market, but Medicare's antiquated payment systems have not contemplated these technologies. I am particularly concerned about cases that have been reported to the agency in which Medicare's inadequate payment has led hospitals to curtail access to needed therapies. We must continually update our policies in response to the rapid pace of advancement in medical science."2
To facilitate patient access to new medical devices, CMS is proposing an alternative new technology add-on payment pathway for devices that received clearance or approval by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) through the Breakthrough Devices Program.
The Breakthrough Devices Program is intended to expedite the development and FDA review of devices that have been designated as breakthrough, which generally refers to new medical devices that provide more effective treatment or diagnosis of a life-threatening or irreversibly debilitating human disease or condition, and that represent a breakthrough technology for which there are no current alternatives, or that offers significant advantages over existing alternatives, or where its availability is in the best interest of patients.3 Device manufacturers can request participation in the Breakthrough Devices Program by submitting a designation request with the FDA.
While such FDA programs help to expedite market entry of new medical devices, adequate payment for such devices continues to be a rate limiting step to patient access. Under the current Medicare payment policy, "CMS requires evidence that devices represent a substantial clinical improvement for the devices to qualify for a new technology add-on payment."4 CMS acknowledges that this can be challenging for breakthrough devices coming onto the market, as real-world data regarding outcomes in different patient populations is often limited at the time of FDA clearance or approval, making it difficult for innovators to meet the requirements for add-on payment.5
CMS' current proposal for add-on payment for new devices that have obtained breakthrough designation includes:6
Additionally, to facilitate patient access to all innovations, CMS proposes increasing the add-on payment from 50 percent to the lesser of: a) 65 percent of the costs of the new medical service or technology; or b) 65 percent of the amount by which the costs of the case exceed the standard diagnosis-related group (DRG) payment, beginning in fiscal year 2020. If finalized, such payment calculation will apply to all current technologies receiving add-on payments as well as all new technologies granted an add-on payment.8
The Advanced Medical Technology Association (AdvaMed) has lobbied for such provisions, arguing that such measures will address the so-called "valley of death" between product approval and reimbursement. In a statement released by AdvaMed, CEO Scott Whitaker applauded CMS' proposal, stating: "We are pleased that this rule reflects several of AdvaMed's priorities, including increasing funding for new technology add-on payments (NTAP), and making it easier for breakthrough technologies to access the Medicare program. This will help ensure that hospitals and patients have access to breakthrough innovations and care, and further incentivize transformational technologies."9
The deadline for submitting comments on the proposed rule is June 24, 2019.
For questions regarding the proposed rule or other CMS policies, healthcare laws or regulatory compliance, FDA's Breakthrough Devices Program, FDA clearance/approval pathways, or FDA compliance, please contact David Hoffmeister, James Ravitz, Georgia Ravitz, or any member of WSGR's life sciences—FDA regulatory, healthcare, and consumer products compliance practice.
Charles Andres and Eva Yin contributed to the preparation of this WSGR alert.