Webinar
Merger transactions are often structured as triangular mergers, which involves the buyer forming a wholly owned subsidiary that is merged with or into the target company. Triangular mergers may be forward or reverse. Tax, legal, and other factors drive the decision of which structure to pursue.
Reverse triangular mergers may be an option if the buyer's objective is to protect the value of contractual rights and licenses of the target company or avoid a transfer of assets, employees, and corporate and tax attributes. Forward triangular mergers may be beneficial where the objective is issuance of stock consideration to the target company shareholders in a tax efficient manner.
Listen as our authoritative panel discusses key considerations for structuring an M&A deal as a reverse or forward triangular merger, potential pitfalls concerning anti-assignment clauses, tax considerations, and drafting approaches.
David Strong is a partner in the Palo Alto and Boulder offices of Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati, where he focuses on mergers and acquisitions, joint ventures, private equity and venture capital investments, restructurings, and distressed situations. He also has substantial experience with regards to the tax aspects of a wide variety of capital markets transactions for domestic and foreign issuers, including initial public offerings and convertible note offerings. Dave has worked on transactions across a broad range of industries, including consumer, healthcare, manufacturing and industrial services, media and entertainment, mining and natural resources, real estate, technology, life sciences, and internet and telecommunications.