Julie worked as an electrical engineer in the field of communications and signal processing for several years before attending law school. Prior to joining Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati in 2000, Julie was with Pennie & Edmonds.

• Nuance Communications v. ABBYY Software House, C.D. Cal., CV-08-1097. Representing plaintiff Nuance in a multi-patent infringement action involving optical character recognition technology.
• SanDisk v. Phison et al., W.D. Wisc., 07 C 0607. Representing plaintiff SanDisk in a multi-patent infringement action against dozens of defendants involving flash memory controller technology.
• Broadcom Corp. v. Intel Corp., E.D. Tex. 501CV302-DF. Represented plaintiff and counterclaim defendant Broadcom Corporation in a multi-patent infringement action. Led the effort to rebut Intel's claims of infringement on one of Intel's patents, and to challenge the validity of that patent. Shortly before trial, successfully moved for summary judgment of noninfringement. The case settled on favorable terms shortly thereafter.
• SanDisk Corporation adv. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., E.D. Tex. 9:02-CV-58. Represented defendant SanDisk Corporation in action in which Samsung alleged that SanDisk's flash memory products infringed four Samsung patents. Lead attorney on a team challenging the validity of two of Samsung's patents, including locating and analyzing prior art. After the inventors were deposed regarding key prior art, the case settled on extremely favorable terms.
• Broadcom Corp. v. Intel Corp., D. Del. 00-776 (RRM). Represented defendant Broadcom Corporation in a multi-patent infringement action. Had day-to-day responsibility for establishing noninfringement and invalidity on one of Intel's patents. Worked on every aspect of trial preparation, and examined fact witness at trial regarding evidence of indirect infringement. At the close of a two-week trial, the jury found for Broadcom on every issue. The case was identified by the National Law Journal as one of the ten biggest defense verdicts of 2002.
• In re Certain Semiconductor Chips with Minimized Chip Package Size and Products Containing Same, U.S.I.T.C. Inv. No. 337-TA-432. Represented complainant Tessera Technologies, Inc. in action involving allegations that Texas Instruments and Sharp Corporation manufactured and imported semiconductor devices in "chip scale packages" ("CSPs") that infringed two Tessera patents. Although TI was dismissed from the ITC based on a forum selection clause, TI ultimately settled and agreed to pay Tessera royalties on TI's CSPs. Led the effort to demonstrate infringement by Sharp's CSPs, and examined Tessera's expert on infringement when the Investigation proceeded to a three-week trial against Sharp in April 2001. Tessera obtained a completely favorable Initial Determination from the Administrative Law Judge; the Commission affirmed. Sharp settled and agreed to pay royalties on its CSPs shortly before the ITC would have entered an exclusion order barring Sharp's CSPs from entering the United States.

Julie Holloway continued

• J.D., University of California, Berkeley, Boalt Hall School of Law, 1998
  Order of the Coif; Editor, California Law Review; Editor, Berkeley Technology Law Journal
• M.S., Electrical Engineering, George Washington University, 1989
• B.S., Electrical Engineering, University of California, San Diego, 1984

• Member, American Bar Association, Intellectual Property Section
• Member, American Intellectual Property Law Association
• Member, ITC Trial Lawyers Association

• Selected for inclusion in the 2007 edition of The Legal 500 US for IP litigation before the ITC

• "Employees' Inventions: Who Owns What Rights?" The Intellectual Property Strategist, Vol. 14, No. 7, April 2008
• "Creation and Transfers of Technology: Intellectual Property Law and Other Applicable Non-Tax Rules," chapter on U.S. intellectual property law and related tax rules, Intellectual Property Taxation, published by the International Bureau of Fiscal Documentation (IBFD)
• "Nuts and Bolts of ITC Investigations," Law Journal Newsletters: The Intellectual Property Strategist, April 2006

• State Bar of California
• U.S. District Court for the Central District of California
• U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of California
• U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California
• U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
• U.S. Patent and Trademark Office